The Consequences of Refusing a Field Sobriety Test in Ohio: Legal Implications & Outcomes

Photo of author

(Newswire.net — March 11, 2024) — In Ohio, when an individual is pulled over on suspicion of driving under the influence (DUI), a law enforcement officer may request that the driver undergo a field sobriety test. These tests are designed to assess a person’s balance, coordination, and the ability of the driver to perform tasks that require divided attention. While drivers may wonder whether they have the option to refuse, it’s important to understand the potential implications of such an action.

The state of Ohio operates under implied consent laws, which means that by holding a driver’s license, a motorist has implicitly agreed to submit to sobriety testing if a police officer suspects intoxication. Consequently, the refusal to take a field sobriety test carries its own set of consequences, separate from those of a DUI charge. Refusal can lead to immediate administrative penalties, such as license suspension, which can occur even before a court appearance.

Understanding Field Sobriety Tests in Ohio

Field Sobriety Tests in Ohio are standardized procedures used to determine impairment due to alcohol or drugs.

Purpose and Types of Tests

The primary purpose of Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) in Ohio is to assess whether a driver is impaired. Law enforcement implements a series of tasks during FSTs to observe coordination, balance, and the ability to follow instructions, which may indicate impairment. There are three types of standardized tests widely accepted and used:

  1. Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test: This test involves tracking the suspect’s eye movement as they follow an object horizontally.
  2. Walk and Turn Test: The suspect is asked to walk nine steps heel-to-toe in a straight line, turn on one foot, and return in the same manner.
  3. One-Leg Stand Test: The suspect must stand with one foot approximately six inches off the ground and count aloud until instructed to put the foot down.

Administering Authority and Legal Standing

In Ohio, Field Sobriety Tests are administered by law enforcement officers who are trained to observe signs of intoxication or impairment. These officers are authorized to conduct FSTs during a lawful traffic stop when impairment is suspected. Refusal to submit to a Field Sobriety Test can lead to certain legal consequences, as implied consent laws in Ohio dictate that drivers have implicitly agreed to these tests when they receive their driver’s license.

Legal Implications of Refusal

In Ohio, drivers have the option to refuse a field sobriety test; however, such a decision carries significant legal implications, including immediate consequences and issues related to the implied consent law.

Immediate Consequences

When a driver in Ohio refuses to undergo a field sobriety test, law enforcement may immediately suspend their driver’s license. This administrative license suspension (ALS) is effective as soon as the refusal is documented:

  • First Offense: Suspension lasting 1 year
  • Second Offense (within 10 years): Suspension lasting 2 years
  • Third Offense (within 10 years): Suspension lasting 3 years

The refusal may also be used as evidence in court, potentially suggesting an admission of guilt which can influence the case’s outcome.

Refusal and Implied Consent Law

Can you refuse a field sobriety test in Ohio? This is a commonly asked question. Ohio’s implied consent law dictates that by operating a vehicle within the state, drivers automatically consent to chemical testing if suspected of Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Consequences of refusing this chemical test include:

  • Mandatory ALS: Regardless of the criminal case outcome
  • Increased Penalties: If convicted of DUI subsequent to refusal
  • Mandatory Jail Time: Depending on the number of DUI offenses on record

The law intends to deter impaired driving by ensuring cooperation with sobriety testing procedures necessary for assessing a driver’s fitness to operate a vehicle.