The 2016 Presidential Elections Are a Test of US Democracy

Photo of author

(Newswire.net — November 12, 2016) — New York, DC – Mass protests taking place in New York and in other states accross US, callint for impeachment of Donald Trump after he was legitimately elected. The protests, mainly organised by Soros and other Democratic Party supporters are questioning democracy in the US, analysts agree.

If Hillary Clinton manages to calm her voters, it will be a true testament to the democratic way and recognition of the will of the majority. However, protesters are claiming more people voted for Hillary, but the way the elections are managed, it looks like “other side” won. Conveniently, Clinton supporters seem to forget that in the same way, Hillary won the nomination pushing Sanders out of the race.

The Canadian immigration reported its website crashed amid the quantity of demands for asylum coming from US citizens.

While half of Americans believe it is doomsday for America, Democrats are now wondering how it was possible that they have lost it all: the majority in the Senate and Congress and the Oval office.

During the campaign, over 90% of media coverage focused on trashing Donald Trump and on all the dirt they could dig up in an unprecedented and biased stance in the history of journalism in the US.  

Hillary Clinton enjoyed the support of President Obama and the majority of respected people speaking on her behalf.

Hillary had the help of a propaganda machine that constantly pelted predictions and pre-voting results emphasizing Clinton’s lead over Trump. She had the advantage of becoming the first female president in the history of America.

Hillary had a very unpopular opponent, and yet she lost the elections.

Having all the prerequisites to win, the main question is how come she lost the elections?

It’s not the negative legacy of her husband that Hillary carried throughout the campaign, it was WikiLeaks. No wonder she dislikes Assange so much, trying to tie the whistleblower to Russia and declare it an espionage conspiracy.

Unfortunately for her, Americans understood what the content of those emails really meant, and Trump was right all along

Analysts agree that Hillary should have withdrawn as soon as the e-mails surfaced and let Sanders defeat Trump, because he could. Now, all democrats have become victim of her personal ambitions.

It is not so much the content of the controversial emails that prevented Hillary from winning the elections, but her failure to understand that Americans want change. They wanted change so much they were prepared to let Trump lead the US.

With Hillary in power, everything would remain the same, and the citizens of America punished her during the elections by letting her lose against Donald Trump.

On the other hand, billionaire Donald Trump immediately laid out all the cards on the table. He demonstrated on numerous occasions he didn’t think the subject through very well, if at all, however, he spoke “from the heart,” and that was the first much needed change voters saw – honesty over a lie.

The other change is corruption. Being a billionaire, it is expected that Trump won’t give slack to mega corporations or wealthy countries in exchange for funding. The Clinton foundation, on the other hand, was financed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia, the same government that financially supports the ISIS.

So it all came down to this: Americans are concerned about their existence. The shrinking of the middle class and the growing gap between rich and poor, frequent corruption scandals and the tendency of the state to pump capital into mega corporations and banks, neglecting small enterprises hit by the same crisis, throwing trillions towards unnecessary wars that actually fuel terrorism, these are the things that Americans want to change.

Trump’s team recognized that and that is the sole reason why Americans supported him over Hillary. This also suggests that Trump had better advisors than Hillary, which ironically made him fitter for becoming the 45th US President.